Home   About   Services   Client Testimonials   Contact   Blog  
Saturday, April 01, 2006

"Pay Per Performance" is a concept that appeals to many interested in sales outsourcing. It makes sense, after all, to only pay when you get results, doesn't it?

Of course, in order to interest an individual or company to work on this basis, there needs to be a significant reward to compensate for the risk and costs you have removed from yourself (not entirely though, as we're not discussing opportunity costs here; we'll save that for another blog).

When you've got no revenue, and non-performance costs you nothing, then how much of the upside are you willing to share? 50%? 60%?

I know another business development company that, on a pay-per-performance basis, takes 75% of any profit made on the deal. Would you be OK with that?

Here's a story from Outsourcing the Sales Function which illustrates the potential problem.

In the 1990's, Jeffrey Katzenberg, a Disney executive, agreed to produce a movie on an entirely performance basis - 2% of the proceeds. At the time, Disney didn't hold high expectations for the project. To everyone's surprise, The Lion King, became a runaway hit and Disney made over a billion dollars in profit.

The performance pay that Disney owed Katzenberg was so large that Chairman Michael Eisner simply refused to pay him. Katzenberg took Disney to court, holding up his contract as exhibit A. Disney eventually settled.

So here's the rub with "pay per performance" - when things go really well, the large rewards can generate regret and envy, even though it was all agreed happily at the start.

In our experience, once sales start to come through, companies will quickly want to re-negotiate the level of performance pay. Of course, if there's a pipeline of business that's been generated and starting to flow, your sales outsourcing company will be reluctant to do this. After all, they've done the "hard work", now it's just a matter of closing the deals taking the lion's share of the revenue.

As always, having a clear exit and hand-over strategy is essential to avoiding potential problems in these type of arrangements.

Labels: ,

Posted by: David Regler @ 2:05 pm |   | Links to this post  

Bookmark and Share


Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

Poor Qualification Can Close You Down

Risk in Startup and Corporate Ventures

New Blog - Linked 'n' 37

A Snap-Shot of Online Networking Growth

Networking on the Internet Pays Off Financially

Sales Outsourcing as a Bootstrapping Strategy

Entrepreneur or Sales Person?

Investor Fair in London - meet Business Angels for...

LinkedIn or openBC...or both!

Watch out for those Cappuccino Meetings

November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
March 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
September 2009
October 2009
November 2009
December 2009
January 2010
March 2010
September 2010
October 2010
November 2010
December 2010
January 2011
February 2011
March 2011
May 2011
July 2011
September 2011
October 2011
November 2011
December 2011
January 2012
February 2012

Powered by Blogger

All content © Maine Associates Ltd 2010 All rights reserved. Read our privacy policy